Martin Ladouceur — Fire-cutting healer-magnetizer
Clinical observation reports in vibrational medicine and therapeutic magnetism
Explore real-world clinical observation reports in vibrational medicine and therapeutic magnetism, documented through both remote sessions and in-clinic support. Each case illustrates a structured approach, objective follow-up and measurable outcomes for adults, children or animals across Canada, Europe and international regions.
Chronic Functional Constipation and Encopresis in a 4-Year-Old Child – Detailed Clinical Observation in Therapeutic Magnetism (Remote Intervention)
Clinical observation initiated on December 17, 2025 – absence of therapeutic response and ethical termination of the protocol
17 décembre 2025
Clinical Introduction
This clinical observation documents an attempt at support using therapeutic magnetism and vibrational medicine, conducted remotely, with a 4-year-old child presenting with chronic functional constipation associated with encopresis, in a context that had already undergone extensive medical evaluation.
The request expressed by the mother was clearly framed as a last-resort approach, following multiple conventional and complementary interventions, including near-daily use of laxatives over an extended period, without sustained improvement. As no identifiable organic cause had been found through medical testing, the condition was described as functional, based on the information provided.
This observation does not aim to establish a medical diagnosis, nor to replace medical care. Its purpose is to document the observed limitations of a vibrational intervention focused solely on the child when the emotional and relational family context remains unchanged. This led to an ethical discontinuation of the protocol, grounded in child protection and recognition of a clear methodological limitation.
Structured Support Methodology
The proposed support was based on therapeutic magnetism and vibrational medicine, delivered exclusively at a distance, within a clearly defined non-medical clinical observation framework.
Framework established from the outset
From the initial exchange, the following elements were explicitly stated:
The intervention was proposed as a time-limited clinical trial, lasting three weeks, beginning on December 17, 2025.
No promise of results was made.
It was clearly stated that some cases do not respond, including pediatric cases.
It was mentioned that children may sometimes respond more quickly, without this constituting any guarantee.
This framework was intended to prevent unrealistic expectations and to maintain a rigorous, observation-based clinical posture, without substituting for medical follow-up.
Protocol organization
Start date: December 17, 2025
Total duration: 3 weeks
Structure: three weekly intervention sequences
Mode: remote intervention
Communication: weekly written follow-ups, supplemented by one exceptional phone call during week two
Complementary explanatory approach
In a spirit of global understanding of the situation, and without therapeutic intent, a free explanatory discussion with the father was also proposed. The purpose was to clarify certain mechanisms that may influence the child’s symptoms.
This proposal was framed as an informational and preventive exchange, without obligation or expectation.
No follow-up was provided in response to this offer.
Clinical Analysis by Period
Week 1 – Initial clinical observation (from December 17, 2025)
The mother reported that the child developed voluntary stool withholding following an acute gastrointestinal episode that occurred previously. Since that time, the child has exhibited a recurrent retention pattern, leading to repeated fecal impactions, requiring regular pharmacological intervention. The child was described as aware of bodily sensations, while showing strong resistance to using the toilet.
No significant physiological or behavioral changes were observed during the first week.
Initial clinical reading (non-diagnostic. The absence of response during the first week appeared atypical for a child of this age, without allowing any conclusion at this stage.
Week 2 – Absence of modulation and phone exchange
The follow-up indicated a complete lack of change. No behavioral relaxation, reduction of bodily tension, or spontaneous improvement was observed.
Given this unusual clinical inertia, an exceptional phone call was conducted with the mother. This exchange highlighted several elements reported and observed in parental discourse, including:
significant emotional fatigue,
marked tension surrounding bowel movements,
a family relational climate described as unstable.
It was reiterated that, in children, functional symptoms may be influenced by the emotional environment, without implying direct causality or a psychological diagnosis.
Week 3 – Confirmation of non-response
At the end of the protocol, the mother reported a significant bowel movement only following laxative administration, with no change in the child’s withholding behavior.
A new fecal blockage was already forming, confirming the absence of autonomous regulation.
No clinical element allowed attribution of improvement to the vibrational intervention. Pharmacological dependence remained unchanged.
Clinical Discussion and Interpretive Analysis
This observation highlights an interwoven set of behavioral and contextual factors, without the possibility of isolating a single cause or formulating a diagnostic conclusion.
The analysis is based on a non-diagnostic clinical reading, grounded in:
information provided by the mother,
observations made throughout the protocol,
and the absence of change despite a well-defined intervention framework.
Identified factors include:
a firmly established stool-withholding behavior,
persistent emotional tension surrounding the symptom,
a family context described as unchanged throughout the intervention,
lack of adult engagement despite explicit explanatory proposals.
It is essential to emphasize that this absence of response cannot be generalized, either regarding the effectiveness of therapeutic magnetism or the role of emotional factors in other clinical contexts.
Professional Conclusion
At the conclusion of the three-week protocol initiated on December 17, 2025, and in accordance with the framework established from the outset, the intervention was naturally discontinued due to the absence of observable clinical improvement.
This decision was based on:
respect for the defined trial framework,
recognition of a clear methodological limitation in this specific context,
and a posture of prudence and protection of the child’s well-being.
The termination of the intervention constitutes a responsible professional decision, consistent with ethical practice and respect for the limits of the practitioner’s scope.
Call for Collaboration
Complex pediatric functional disorders require a global approach that integrates the child’s relational and emotional environment. Any future collaboration should prioritize a framework that respects child development and the boundaries of each professional discipline.
Full Testimonial
No testimonial was provided at the conclusion of the protocol. The proposal for a complementary parental explanatory exchange did not result in further contact.